| 1. | What is your citizenship? |
| 4 | Australia |
| 4 | Asia |
| 65 | Europe |
| 84 | North America |
| 8 | South America |
| 3 | Other |
| 2. | What is your country of residence? |
| 4 | Australia |
| 6 | Asia |
| 60 | Europe |
| 89 | North America |
| 7 | South America |
| 2 | Other |
| 3. | What is your age range? |
| 10 | 20-30 |
| 28 | 30-40 |
| 30 | 40-50 |
| 46 | 50-60 |
| 54 | 60+ |
| 4. | Define yourself. |
| 156 | Teacher/Researcher |
| 4 | Student |
| 8 | Other |
| 5. | What is the highest degree you hold? |
| 1 | B.A. |
| 14 | M.A. |
| 150 | Ph.D. |
| 0 | None |
| 3 | Other |
| 6. | Where did you get your last degree? |
| 86 | North America |
| 70 | Europe |
| 4 | Asia |
| 3 | Australia/NZ |
| 5 | South America |
| 7. | How long have you been a member of HES? |
| 25 | I am not a member |
| 12 | Less than 2 years |
| 31 | 2 - 5 years |
| 29 | 5 - 10 years |
| 36 | 10 - 20 years |
| 35 | More than 20 years
|
| 8. | Is the History of Economic Thought taught at your institution? |
| 54 | At the graduate level |
| 119 | At the undergraduate level |
| 32 | Not at all |
| 5 | I don't know |
| 9. | Do you teach a course in the history of economic thought? |
| 84 | Yes |
| 84 | No |
| 10. | What other courses do you teach? | |
| 11. | What do you think of the visual quality of the website? |
| 26 | Excellent |
| 101 | Good |
| 20 | Fair |
| 2 | Poor |
| 19 | No Opinion |
| 12. | How useful do you find it? | |
| 26 | Excellent |
| 90 | Good |
| 26 | Fair |
| 2 | Poor |
| 24 | No Opinion |
| 13. | If you think something is missing from the website, what is it? |
| 14. | Which period is the primary focus of your research? |
| 1 | Antiquity |
| 1 | Renaissance |
| 18 | 17th and 18th Centuries |
| 74 | 1800 - 1870 |
| 64 | 1870-1950 |
| 49 | 1950- |
| 25 | Can't be classified or not applicable |
| 15. | Would you describe your work as primarily: |
| 102 | Studies of the economic writing of individuals in historical and political context (archive based) |
| 97 |
Studies of schools or institutions or groups of economists |
| 34 | History of macroeconomics |
| 31 | History of microeconomics, including recent variants |
| 14 | History of applied economics |
| 33 | Histories of particular fields of economics (i.e. labour or finance) |
| 63 | Studies of interdisciplinary exchanges between economics and other disciplines |
| 54 | Philosophy of economics |
| 46 | Methodology |
| 16. | Do you read articles that may be described as: |
| 132 | Studies of the economic writing of individuals in historical and political context (archive based) |
| 133 | Studies of schools or institutions or groups of economists |
| 49 | History of macroeconomics |
| 46 | History of microeconomics, including recent variants |
| 24 | History of applied economics |
| 48 | Histories of particular fields of economics (i.e. labour or finance) |
| 86 | Studies of interdisciplinary exchanges between economics and other disciplines |
| 78 | Philosophy of economics |
| 59 | Methodology |
| 17. | Do you use JHET for teaching purposes? | |
| 123 | Yes |
| 45 | No |
| 18. | JHET should devote more space to survey articles that address questions such as: "What do we know about(for example, Adam Smith) that we did not know twenty-five years ago?" | |
| 90 | Agree |
| 28 | Disagree |
| 50 | Indifferent |
| 19. | JHET should have more review articles that consider multiple books and place them in context. | |
| 111 | Agree |
| 15 | Disagree |
| 42 | Indifferent |
| 20. | JHET should have articles on the history of other social sciences |
| 51 | Agree |
| 77 | Disagree |
| 40 | Indifferent |
| 21. | JHET should have more articles addressing the history of economics from parts of the world other than Europe and the US. | |
| 70 | Agree |
| 27 | Disagree |
| 71 | Indifferent |
| 22. | JHET should have more articles addressing relatively less well-known economists. |
| 55 | Agree |
| 37 | Disagree |
| 76 | Indifferent |
| 23. | JHET should have more articles addressing the history of recent economics | |
| 106 | Agree |
| 21 | Disagree |
| 41 | Indifferent |
| 24. | JHET should have a policy of encouraging certain areas rather than letting its coverage be guided entirely by submissions. |
| 43 | Agree |
| 77 | Disagree |
| 48 | Indifferent |
| 25. | Besides HES, have you attended other society conferences in the past two years? |
| 12 | AISPE |
| 5 | Association Charles GIDE |
| 48 | ESHET |
| 5 | HETSA |
| 5 | JSHET |
| 22 | STOREP |
| 101 | None of the above |
| 26. | Besides HES, have you attended other events in the past two years such as workshops and colloquia? |
| 26 | HISRECO |
| 20 | Summer Institute |
| 15 | UK September meeting |
| 103 | None of the above |
| 27. | How do you rate the quality of the papers and sessions at the HES annual meeting? |
| 18 | Excellent |
| 68 | Good |
| 34 | Fair |
| 9 | Poor |
| 39 | No Opinion |
| 28. | In emphasizing inclusivity, HES currently accepts almost all paper proposals submitted for the HES annual conference. Do you favour continuing this inclusive approach, or would you prefer that more proposals be rejected in order to raise the average quality? |
| 101 | Continue the current inclusive approach |
| 40 | Reject more proposals with the goal of raising average quality |
| 27 | Indifferent |
| 29. | Do you think the ability to socialize at the HES annual meetings is |
| 59 | Crucial |
| 91 | Important |
| 15 | Of little importance |
| 2 | Not important |
| 30. | Do you think there should be more Young Scholars sessions? |
| 55 | Yes |
| 47 | No |
| 66 | Indifferent |
| 31. | Should the meeting be held outside of North America occasionally? |
| 85 | Yes |
| 43 | No |
| 40 | Indifferent |